Millers Irony and the Truth about American Witch Hunts Essay -- Polit

Silence has pervaded every imaginable recess in the old dilapidated courthouse. A one C profound onlookers hold their breath in baited anticipation. Suddenly, the dull sound that only woodwind instrument can make as it slams into an desk echoes for what may as well be all eternity. A single cosmos garners the attention of two hundred eyes as he unintentionally clears his throat. However his lips only argon able to take form around one bloodcurdling articulate guilty. Although of what crime depends on the time period of the aforementioned case, for trials such as these have occurred in American History non once and twice. The first began patronage in the 1600s in a little townspeople known as Salem Massachu dress outts, where people were killed for crimes of enthrallcraft. The second instance, while not quite as known for bestowing rigor mortis still put ill-use on the lives of many. Trials in the 1950s fueled by McCarthyism and the idea that communism was attack th e United States led to the blacklisting of many people as supposed socialists. Arthur milling machine saw the real story of the trials for supposed unamericans during his time and he set about making it known to the public. However, had miller outright stated his views he would have found himself in the same position as those whos stories he tried to tell. Therefore he devised a creative solution he wrote a story based on events in the Salem witch trials that is nearly perfectly symbolic of the McCarthyism trials. Millers extensive use of satire in the crucible reveals the actual motives behind events carried out during the Salem witch trials, and thereby he exposes the dark truth of what happened during 1950s McCarthyism trials on Unamerican activities. Even in the very reference Miller wastes no time in d... ... in the court goes back to the confession of John proctor. He finally admits to his sin after months of privacy it and then Danforth and the court bluntly say to h im she spoke nothing of lechery, and this man has lied. (113?) This shows that when an actual bit of truth is presented to the lawmen, they reject it and again side with the liars. The situational irony lies in the fact that when Proctor confesses his sin, the court rejects his confession altogether on only the evidence of his wifes claim. These three examples of irony are perhaps the nearly important of all in relation to McCarthyism. They reveal that the court itself may represent unfairness in its proceedings. (jr 23?) Miller urges his readers to believe that the adjudicate not only believed liars and rejected the truth, but also that they pushed for the convictions rather than a fair trial.