Information to commit a crime Essay

The article from The trip on sunshine spreads oer 2/3s of a page. It is at low gear glance more provoke than the previous article beca employment it contains a large color picture of entitle bowman and his wife, and a smaller picture of the curb he has belatedly published. Articles with pictures beside them seize the contri butors attention. The caption under the picture of bowman and his wife reads inside(a) job which suggests a crime has been committed from inside prison. Inside job is a word use to refer to those who use their access to privileged information to commit a crime.It is an exaggerated and salient term to use, which will catch the readers interest. genus Sagittarius could bulge a fortune from his prison diary, left, which could ease his and wife Marys cash flow bothers This sentence is intended to be humorous because it is sarcastic. The noble and lady are not expected to catch any bullion troubles or cash flow problems. Humor is a method apply by jo urnalists to incite their readers. Also, here is introduced a motive for releasing the book that was not mentioned in the other article.However the article does not learn substantial evidence that this is true, and not just a conclusion raddled by the reporter for the purpose of obtaining public interest. The article says that this had been said by sources close to the family. Neverthe little(prenominal) it does go on to say that Archer latterly paid out 2. 7 million to Express Newspapers. The Mail on Sunday article is similarly set out in columns. distant The Sunday Telegraph this article contains larger font for the first dickens paragraphs of the article. This is done because it contains the basis of the story and larger font stands out more. there is one enlarged quote, which reads He simply put his memoirs in the localize. The reporter chose to enlarge this because it will surprise the readers. It is a controversial stopover should Archer really conduct just been allowe d to post his memoirs. The article uses voice communication such as far from smuggling the manuscript out which suggests this is what would have been expected. The article goes on to explain that prison authorities can cross off prisoners outgoing post and that they could have censored Archers book. This leaves the reader wondering why they allowed Archers book to get out.Could it be because he is a Lord and has high social status than the bonnie prisoner? I think that is what the article is suggesting throughout. It does this because it wants to raise a repoint, coiffe the readers think and get their attention. The talking to in this article uses more adjectives than the Sunday Telegraph article, examples of this are Calls were made for Archer to be dealt with harshly. A spokesman criticized the prison service. This has the effect of persuading to the reader to agree with the reporters point of view. Un the like the Sunday Telegraph article it refuses to sit on the fence. tw o the articles are similar to each other in some of the ways they were write. For instance it is written like a story with intervening quotes and opinions from various people. Frances Crook says anyone should have the right to free speech and free look. The article also stops to explain facts to the reader such as letters or phone calls to or from the prison can be read. The Mail on Sunday talks about more more different aspects relating to the story than the Sunday telegraph which chooses to stick to the briny story. The Mail on Sunday article speaks of the cash flow problem.It explains what else has happened to Archer whilst he has been in prison, used a weekend domicil leave to attend a champagne party and lavish lunches with prison staff . The word lavish suggests to the reader that Archer is having an easy time, sustentation the life of a high society, rich man. It is said because the reporter feels that Archer should not be treated as well as he is, because he is a crim inal. It goes on to explain that these breaches of prison rules has meant he has been transferred. The first paragraph of this article says Archer is expected to escape any hard punishment for publishing his Prison Diaries.It also states that the diary is likely to earn him at least 300,000. The word escape suggests to the reader that Archer deserves a punishment and is getting out of it. The 300,000 is also a lot less than the 500,000 the Sunday Telegraph said Archer had gained. The effect of money written of in the first paragraph is also make the reader interest and angry that Archer has received so much money but will not be punished for his crime. The title stating that the punishment for Archers crime is to have his TV removed is not wholly accurate. A prison service insider as one of a second of possible punishments mentioned it.The article picked up on this and enlarged its importance to transfix readers attention because it sounds like a stupid and unfair punishment. The article also mentions that under Prison Rule 55, Archer could have seven weeks added to his sentence. However this is still a lot less than the extra year mentioned in the other article. The two Newspaper articles were rattling similar in many ways because they were of the same type of media. I found the main differences between them were the main facts of their stories, the punishments disagreed with each other.They both used different techniques for get the readers attention. The purpose of this was to capture and maintain an interest in the article. The overall purpose is to sell newspapers, and make money. The Sunday Telegraph is cognise to be a more trustworthy newspaper than tabloids such as the Mail on Sunday. The article in the Sunday Telegraph was a straightforward news event and it had no signs of being biased. All the facts were presented The Mail on Sunday appealed more to peoples need for twaddle and scandal, it tried to make the reader feel annoyed and shocked. This article was stop at catching the readers eye because of the layout and bright pictures. I think the Mail on Sunday also did a break away job of maintaining the readers interest because most people like to read about the more scandalous side of stories and it is more kindle when an article sways your emotions. The Sunday Telegraph, can be trusted to give a relatively non-biased true account but it is less interesting to read. The language in both articles was very similar both used simple, real writing backed up with quotes.