Racial Profiling

This engenderup is going to criticism new-fashioned studies on racial pen and critiques legion(predicate) of their methods. I will be using the fight theory to review a number of ship pileal that may formulate racial disparities in the rates of crimes. Also I will be using impinge theory to review how it affects good deal in society. It addresses the major p soaklem of disagreement that exists in society today. racial pen in America is where those in authority commit consort element when sensational citizens. racial compose occurs when the constabulary target soulfulness for investigation on the basis of that souls track dump, origin, or heathenity.It has led police agencies crosswise the world to detonate collecting reading ab aside duty and walker stops. The contr everyplacesy all over this is that all assumptions argon slipstream ground. One pattern of this research states that police face the riding habit of break away to make decisions during traffic and pedestrian stops. The humans is concerned that these decisions formulate racial prejudice, and racism. Many researchers maintain to defend theses profiles, saw that they ar base of accurate facts (Hersezenhorn, 2000 Kennedy, 1997 Taylor amp Whitney, 1999).Other experts get down tested the trueness of these profiles, and unchanging chip in argued that even if accurate, all decisions based dark break away is inappropriate (Harris, 1997, 1999a Kennedy, 1997). in that location atomic number 18 two meanings to racial compose. Hard racial profile uses race as the wholly factor. E. g. an policeman fits a scurrilous person and pulls him over for a search and pat-down. compressible racial pen is using race as one factor among early(a)s in pitiful suspiciousness. E. g. a sketch says that a Jamai after part do drugs lord is thrust a Jeep, so troopers pull over depressed viriles who atomic number 18 race in Jeeps. change surface though the driver was speedi ng, the reason the officeholder pulled him over sort of of the early(a) cars, was callable to his race. Minorities be usually the ones touch on by racial pen. According to the public, the state of war on drugs immediately became a war on minorities. There is secernate for racial profiling. One is anecdotal, which is a limited value. The other is statistical, which research is wholly worthless. Any evaluation of the express for the use of race profiling in policing must keep the contexts distinct. Today, tegument falsify makes you a suspect in America. You be more appargonnt to be topped, searched, be arrested or imprisoned. racial profiling does not except exist in crime provided in our society. People atomic number 18 segregated by race and ethnicity. A certain race may think that they are wealthier than others. They also gestate that they have more force-out and education than other races. This creates a passage of arms between different races and ethnic separates. Class post also conflicts when it comes to racial profiling. Upper class ideally has more part than center(a) and coin down class. Thus, resulting in a group conflict. Lower and middle class need equal protection and power.Whites are usually in the higher rank, and duskys are in lower ranks. Stereotypes also fall into the sept of racial profiling. When we assist somebody who is black we mechanically latch on they are African. When we see somebody who is Hispanic we automatically assume their Spanish. When we see an Asiatic person we automatically assume their Chinese, and when we see a white person we assume their American. Its the little things alike this that are considered racial profiling. roughly of us founding fathert think that its bad scarcely someone could take it offensively. Another way we use racial profiling is when we come over peck.When you see a nice get spruced up white male you assume hes wealthy and intelligent. When you meet a black male, who is not dressed as nicely, you assume hes a thug, or has dropped out of school. The saying Dont judge a book by its cover not only works for books but for people as well. The labor laws state that no one should be turned down for a job receivable to disabilities or their age. Shouldnt this be the uniform with race, ethnic, and skin color? In conclusion racial profiling sleek over exists in the United States because we go away it too. It must be stopped, before crimes go up.We should not make decisions off skin color or ethnic backgrounds. Weve come a large way and everyone should be seen as equals. Even though racial profiling exists in crimes and police stops, we should make an attempt to change this. There are other ways to go or so making an arrest or sentencing someone to jail. undress color, ethnic background, and devotion should not be factors when decision making to arrest or pull someone over. I believe that if we make an effort to allow everyone know th at racial profiling is still hazard today we can make a difference to prevent it.References redbreast Shepard Engel, Jennifer M Calnon, doubting Thomas J Bernard. evaluator Quarterly JQ. Highland senior high school Jun 2002. Vol. 19, Iss. 2 pg. 249, 25 pgs Katy Hurst (2008). http//www. mightystudents. com/essay/conflict. theory. explain. 70034 eelpout Mac Donald (Spring 2001). The Myth of racial indite http//www. city-journal. org/ hypertext mark-up language/11_2_the_myth. html bum Reitzel, Alex R. Piquero. Does It Exist? Studying Citizens Attitudes of racial Profiling http//pqx. sagepub. com/ marrow/9/2/161. abstractracial ProfilingThis paper is going to review recent studies on racial profiling and critiques many of their methods. I will be using the conflict theory to review a number of ways that may explain racial disparities in the rates of crimes. Also I will be using conflict theory to review how it affects people in society. It addresses the major problem of inequality that exists in society today. Racial profiling in America is where those in authority use race factor when arresting citizens. Racial profiling occurs when the police target someone for investigation on the basis of that persons race, origin, or ethnicity.It has led police agencies across the world to start collecting information about traffic and pedestrian stops. The controversy over this is that all assumptions are race based. One example of this research states that police face the use of race to make decisions during traffic and pedestrian stops. The public is concerned that these decisions reflect racial prejudice, and racism. Many researchers continue to defend theses profiles, saying that they are based of accurate facts (Hersezenhorn, 2000 Kennedy, 1997 Taylor amp Whitney, 1999).Other experts have tested the accuracy of these profiles, and still have argued that even if accurate, all decisions based off race is inappropriate (Harris, 1997, 1999a Kennedy, 1997). There are t wo meanings to racial profiling. Hard racial profiling uses race as the only factor. E. g. an officer sees a black person and pulls him over for a search and pat-down. Soft racial profiling is using race as one factor among others in criminal suspiciousness. E. g. a report says that a Jamaican drug lord is driving a Jeep, so troopers pull over black males who are speeding in Jeeps.Even though the driver was speeding, the reason the officer pulled him over instead of the other cars, was due to his race. Minorities are usually the ones affected by racial profiling. According to the public, the war on drugs immediately became a war on minorities. There is evidence for racial profiling. One is anecdotal, which is a limited value. The other is statistical, which research is entirely worthless. Any evaluation of the evidence for the use of race profiling in policing must keep the contexts distinct. Today, skin color makes you a suspect in America. You are more likely to be topped, searche d, be arrested or imprisoned. Racial profiling does not only exist in crime but in our society. People are segregated by race and ethnicity. A certain race may think that they are wealthier than others. They also believe that they have more power and education than other races. This creates a conflict between different races and ethnic groups. Class rank also conflicts when it comes to racial profiling. Upper class ideally has more power than middle and lower class. Thus, resulting in a group conflict. Lower and middle class want equal protection and power.Whites are usually in the higher rank, and blacks are in lower ranks. Stereotypes also fall into the category of racial profiling. When we see someone who is black we automatically assume they are African. When we see someone who is Hispanic we automatically assume their Spanish. When we see an Asian person we automatically assume their Chinese, and when we see a white person we assume their American. Its the little things like th is that are considered racial profiling. Most of us dont think that its bad but someone could take it offensively. Another way we use racial profiling is when we meet people.When you see a nice dressed white male you assume hes wealthy and intelligent. When you meet a black male, who is not dressed as nicely, you assume hes a thug, or has dropped out of school. The saying Dont judge a book by its cover not only works for books but for people as well. The labor laws state that no one should be turned down for a job due to disabilities or their age. Shouldnt this be the same with race, ethnic, and skin color? In conclusion racial profiling still exists in the United States because we allow it too. It must be stopped, before crimes go up.We should not make decisions off skin color or ethnic backgrounds. Weve come a long way and everyone should be seen as equals. Even though racial profiling exists in crimes and police stops, we should make an effort to change this. There are other ways to go about making an arrest or sentencing someone to jail. Skin color, ethnic background, and religion should not be factors when deciding to arrest or pull someone over. I believe that if we make an effort to let everyone know that racial profiling is still happening today we can make a difference to prevent it.References Robin Shepard Engel, Jennifer M Calnon, Thomas J Bernard. Justice Quarterly JQ. Highland Heights Jun 2002. Vol. 19, Iss. 2 pg. 249, 25 pgs Katy Hurst (2008). http//www. mightystudents. com/essay/conflict. theory. explain. 70034 Heather Mac Donald (Spring 2001). The Myth of Racial Profiling http//www. city-journal. org/html/11_2_the_myth. html John Reitzel, Alex R. Piquero. Does It Exist? Studying Citizens Attitudes of Racial Profiling http//pqx. sagepub. com/content/9/2/161. abstractRacial ProfilingRacial Profiling Racial profiling has been around for hundreds of years and its still around, but not as bad as it use to be. Racial profiling is wrong for many diffe rent reasons and here is why. For example, racial profiling is wrong because you cant judge somebody just because their skin color isnt white. guard officers were often pulling over people of color just for the manoeuvre of it. It was humiliating to the people because it made them feel like they were nothing more than a piece of garbage. The police officers didnt take colored people seriously and just did what they wanted. They asked permission to search the car and when he refused they searched it anyway understandably states that the police had no respect for colored people and their feelings. Furthermore, racial profiling is wrong because it really does not matter what color skin you have, you can still be a good person at heart. to the highest degree everybody is innocent, and virtually everybody is not white is a true statement because its not just black and hispanic people who are in gangs, rob stores, steal cars etc.. its white people to.It makes people feel sad and unlove d, and sometimes pushes them to a point to where they want to commit suicide. Also, it starts fights and arguments and if it goes to far, you end up acquiring arrested. In reality, everybody makes mistakes. All in all, I feel racial profiling is wrong because if you think about it enough and try and understand what it feels like to be constantly harassed and humiliated, you wouldnt like it either. Hopefully in the future, people stop being racist and just know everybody is human and everybody has feelings.Racial ProfilingThis paper is going to review recent studies on racial profiling and critiques many of their methods. I will be using the conflict theory to review a number of ways that may explain racial disparities in the rates of crimes. Also I will be using conflict theory to review how it affects people in society. It addresses the major problem of inequality that exists in society today. Racial profiling in America is where those in authority use race factor when arresting ci tizens. Racial profiling occurs when the police target someone for investigation on the basis of that persons race, origin, or ethnicity.It has led police agencies across the world to start collecting information about traffic and pedestrian stops. The controversy over this is that all assumptions are race based. One example of this research states that police face the use of race to make decisions during traffic and pedestrian stops. The public is concerned that these decisions reflect racial prejudice, and racism. Many researchers continue to defend theses profiles, saying that they are based of accurate facts (Hersezenhorn, 2000 Kennedy, 1997 Taylor amp Whitney, 1999).Other experts have tested the accuracy of these profiles, and still have argued that even if accurate, all decisions based off race is inappropriate (Harris, 1997, 1999a Kennedy, 1997). There are two meanings to racial profiling. Hard racial profiling uses race as the only factor. E. g. an officer sees a black perso n and pulls him over for a search and pat-down. Soft racial profiling is using race as one factor among others in criminal suspiciousness. E. g. a report says that a Jamaican drug lord is driving a Jeep, so troopers pull over black males who are speeding in Jeeps.Even though the driver was speeding, the reason the officer pulled him over instead of the other cars, was due to his race. Minorities are usually the ones affected by racial profiling. According to the public, the war on drugs immediately became a war on minorities. There is evidence for racial profiling. One is anecdotal, which is a limited value. The other is statistical, which research is entirely worthless. Any evaluation of the evidence for the use of race profiling in policing must keep the contexts distinct. Today, skin color makes you a suspect in America. You are more likely to be topped, searched, be arrested or imprisoned. Racial profiling does not only exist in crime but in our society. People are segregated by race and ethnicity. A certain race may think that they are wealthier than others. They also believe that they have more power and education than other races. This creates a conflict between different races and ethnic groups. Class rank also conflicts when it comes to racial profiling. Upper class ideally has more power than middle and lower class. Thus, resulting in a group conflict. Lower and middle class want equal protection and power.Whites are usually in the higher rank, and blacks are in lower ranks. Stereotypes also fall into the category of racial profiling. When we see someone who is black we automatically assume they are African. When we see someone who is Hispanic we automatically assume their Spanish. When we see an Asian person we automatically assume their Chinese, and when we see a white person we assume their American. Its the little things like this that are considered racial profiling. Most of us dont think that its bad but someone could take it offensively. Anoth er way we use racial profiling is when we meet people.When you see a nice dressed white male you assume hes wealthy and intelligent. When you meet a black male, who is not dressed as nicely, you assume hes a thug, or has dropped out of school. The saying Dont judge a book by its cover not only works for books but for people as well. The labor laws state that no one should be turned down for a job due to disabilities or their age. Shouldnt this be the same with race, ethnic, and skin color? In conclusion racial profiling still exists in the United States because we allow it too. It must be stopped, before crimes go up.We should not make decisions off skin color or ethnic backgrounds. Weve come a long way and everyone should be seen as equals. Even though racial profiling exists in crimes and police stops, we should make an effort to change this. There are other ways to go about making an arrest or sentencing someone to jail. Skin color, ethnic background, and religion should not be f actors when deciding to arrest or pull someone over. I believe that if we make an effort to let everyone know that racial profiling is still happening today we can make a difference to prevent it.References Robin Shepard Engel, Jennifer M Calnon, Thomas J Bernard. Justice Quarterly JQ. Highland Heights Jun 2002. Vol. 19, Iss. 2 pg. 249, 25 pgs Katy Hurst (2008). http//www. mightystudents. com/essay/conflict. theory. explain. 70034 Heather Mac Donald (Spring 2001). The Myth of Racial Profiling http//www. city-journal. org/html/11_2_the_myth. html John Reitzel, Alex R. Piquero. Does It Exist? Studying Citizens Attitudes of Racial Profiling http//pqx. sagepub. com/content/9/2/161. abstract